CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Many communities in Africa continue to be affected by long-standing conflicts with mass traumatization of their populations. Nigeria, as a country has a variety of low grade conflicts that result in chronic bloodletting without the country actually being in an open state of war. Over the past decade, the political crisis over ‘indigene’ rights and political representation in Jos, capital of Plateau State, Nigeria, has developed into a protracted communal conflict Krause, 2011). This recurring conflict often involves maiming, killing, burning of houses, motor vehicles and other properties. The effects of these crises include injuries, emotional trauma, and disabilities, loss of homes and livelihood as well as death. At least 4,000 and possibly as many as 7,000 people have been killed since late 2001, when the first major riot in more than three decades broke out in Jos. After the 2008 riot, more than 10,000 were displaced, while violence in 2010 resulted in about 18,000 people becoming internally displaced. All sides suffer a massive loss due to livelihoods destroyed (Krause, 2011)
The intensity of internal displacement has become a global problem. It has emerged as one of the great human tragedies of the 21st century. It has been estimated that almost 50 million people had been internally displaced worldwide due to conflicts or violations of human rights by the year 2010 (World Health Organization, 2009). According to several organizations, the number of victims range between one and nine million people. In addition, social, economic, political, legal, psychological, and health problems related to internal displacement still exist. Conflicts and wars have ineradicable changes in societal dynamics (Somasundoram, 2009). Therefore, this kind of societal traumas experienced by the victim of conflict and disasters affected most internally displaced persons (IDPs). To provide useful assessments of the IDPs, the approached most take into account the effects on the individual and social aspects (Summerfield, 2003).
Internally displaced persons (IDPs) are person who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence in particular as a result of or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situation or generalized violence, violation of human rights or natural or human made distress, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized state border (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, OHCHR, 2007). It is therefore, necessary to distinguished between refugees and IDPs. If the displaced persons cross international border and falls under one of the relevant international legal instrument, they are considered refugees. IDPs reflect two factors; the coercive or otherwise involuntary character of movement and the fact that such movement takes place within national border. First, some of the common causes of involuntary movements are armed conflict, violence and human right violation and disaster (NRC, 2009).
The history of Nigeria, immediately after attaining our republican status had been greeted with various kinds of political violence and conflicts. The implication is that men, women and children had been on the receiving end of all these problems. Nigeria remains a multi-ethnic nation which has between 350-500 linguistics groups and Populated by fairly half Christians and Muslims (Salawu, 2010; Paden, 2008; Tiffen, 1968; Hansford, Bendor-Samuel & Stanford, 1976). With a history of ethno-religious conflict in Nigeria, the past year has witnessed an alarming upsurge in the level of violence and its impact on civilians. Almost one year after spiraling violence between mainly Muslim cattle herders and Christian farmers in central Plateau state left possibly more than 1,000 people dead and 258,000 temporarily displaced, many of those who fled are still too scared to return to their villages and residential areas.
Cumulative figures for internal displacement are provided by the National Commission for Refugees (NCFR). In February 2014, it reported that there were 3.3 million IDPs in the country as of 31 December 2013. It has not provided figures for 2014. The Presidential Initiative on the North-east (PINE) and the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) reported that Boko Haram had displaced 1.5 million people in the north-east (OCHA, 23 September 2014). No independent estimates are provided, either by the UN resident humanitarian coordinator’s office or the Abuja regional branch of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
In addition to creating large numbers of immediate direct casualties in combatants and civilians, these conflicts have the potential to influence public and mental health outcomes in several ways (Davis, Kuritsky,2002; Kalipeni, and Oppong,1998). The mental health effects of armed conflict on civilians are enormous and can last a lifetime. One major mental health effect of conflict is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Musisi, (2004). PTSD is an anxiety disorder which consists of a syndrome that develops after a person sees, is involved in, or hears of an extreme traumatic stressor. The person reacts to this experience with fear and helplessness, persistently relieves the event, and tries to avoid being reminded of it Association, (2013) and Hodes,(2000). The disorder usually develops within weeks, months or even years after the occurrence of the traumatic event. Symptoms of PTSD can include nightmares and flashbacks, insomnia, lack of concentration, and feelings of isolation, irritability and guilt Obilom, Thacher,2008; Rehn, Sirleaf,2002).
Prevalence of PTSD is about 8% in the general population while lifetime prevalence rates range from 5-75% among high risk groups whose members experienced traumatic events Steel, Chey, Silove, Marnane, Bryant,2009; Kessler, Sonnega, Bromet, and Hughes, (1995). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC) Atlanta, reported that about 30-70% of people who have lived in war zones suffer from symptoms of PTSD and depression Prevention, (2014). Studies carried out among offspring of Holocaust survivors revealed that there was a higher prevalence of mental disorders such as mood, anxiety and substance abuse disorders as well as PTSD among them than in the general population of Jews who did not experience the holocaust (Yehuda, Bell, Bierer, and Schmeidler, 2007). A study carried out among residents of Jos, Nigeria some months after the first major ethno-religious riot in 2001 found a prevalence of PTSD symptoms of 41% Obilom, and Thatcher, (2008). Lifetime PTSD prevalence rates are generally higher in populations exposed to chronic conflicts or recurrent natural disasters (Margoob, Sheikh, 2006; Yaswi, and Haque,2008).
Furthermore, events that are threatening to life or bodily integrity will produce traumatic stress in its victim. This is a normal, adaptive response of the mind and body to protect the individual by preparing him to respond to the threat by fighting or fleeing. If the fight or flight is successful, the traumatic stress will usually be released or dissipated allowing the victim to return to a normal level of functioning. PTSD develops: when fight or flight is not possible; the threat persists over a long period of time; and/or the threat is so extreme that the instinctive response of the victim is to freeze. There is a mistaken assumption that anyone experiencing a traumatic event will have PTSD. This is far from true. Studies vary, but confirm that only a fraction of those facing trauma will develop PTSD (Elliott 1997, Kulka et al 1990, Breslau et al 1991). What distinguishes those who do not is still a hot topic of discussion, but there are many clues. Factors mediating traumatic stress appear to include: preparation for expected stress (when possible), successful fight or flight responses, prior experience, internal resources, support from family, community, and social networks, debriefing, emotional release, and psychotherapy. PTSD is a relatively new diagnostic category in the history of psychology. The diagnosis of PTSD first appeared in 1980 in the internationally accepted authority on PTSD, the DSM (American Psychiatry Association, 1980). At that time the DSM had a limited view of what could cause Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, defining it as developing from an experience that anyone would find traumatic, leaving no room for individual perception or experience of an event. This definition was expanded when the DSM III was revised in 1987, and the DSM IV (APA, 1994) provides even broader criteria. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder as presented in the DSM IV accepts that PTSD develops in response to events that are threatening to life or bodily integrity, witnessing threatening or deadly events, and hearing of violence to or the unexpected or violent death of close associates. Events that could qualify as traumatic, according to the DSM IV, include: combat, sexual and physical assault, being held hostage or imprisoned, terrorism, torture, natural and manmade disasters, accidents, and receiving a diagnosis of a life threatening illness. The DSM IV adds, “The disorder may be especially severe or long lasting when the stressor is of human design (e.g. terrorism, torture, rape) APA, 1994. Symptoms associated with PTSD include;
iii) Chronic hyper arousal in the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS). PTSD is present when these symptoms last more than one month and are combined with loss of function in areas such as job or social relationships. (APA 1994)
Recent events have focused the world’s attention on the psychological effects of terrorism. Elevated rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms have been found in the aftermath of major terrorist attacks in the United States (Galea, Ahern, Resnick, Kilpatrick, Bucuvalas, Gold & Vlahov, 2002). These symptoms as noted tend to subside with time (Silver, Holman, McIntosh, Poulin & Gil-Rivas, 2002); DSM-IV-TR asserts that PTSD may be especially severe or long lasting when the stressor is of human design (p. 464). It further suggested that stressors occurring at aftermath of traumatic events contribute to the occurrence of the disorder. Repeated act of terror are associated with significant distress in affected communities and thereby might interfere with the recovery from early PTSD symptoms and lead to a higher incidence of PTSD.
Political violence and war affect all sections of the country and it is not particular to any ethnic group. Most recently, a post election violent conflict in Northern Nigeria led to resettlement of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in a camp in Kaduna, and Plateau state. In contrast to what she had to go through with ethno religious crises, Plateau state provided a safe place for some IDPs running from the boko haram terror in the northeast. This study is set out to assessed prevalence and socio-demographic factors associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among IDPs. We also determined types of psycho-trauma experienced by the IDPs and their psychosocial adjustment.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The increasing spread of nefarious activities of the Boko Haram sect, ethno religious conflict and natural disasters which has resulted to destruction of lives and property is a serious issue that could not be dismissed with a wave of hand. The activities of the Boko Haram group caught the attention of international community following series of violent attacks in Nigeria since July 2009. The attacks lead to massive displacement of persons mostly from the northeastern Nigeria. Most of the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) had to flee from the danger zones to safer places (Jimmoh, 2011).
Consequently, it is commonly observed during armed conflict and disasters that valuable properties are destroyed and scores of deaths recorded. However, the mental state of victims who are displaced due to attacks cannot be ascertain by mere observation and as a result less attention has been paid to the psychological wellbeing of the internally displace persons, often the government is quick to supply relief materials to the IDPs spread across mostly northern state such as Plateau state due it relative peace it enjoys. Little is done to assess and rehabilitate the IDPs Psychologically by the Government and other relevant bodies, there seems to be lack of comprehensive information on IDPs’ psychological status, situation which left many IDPs in a difficult position as they seek to adjust in their host communities by suppressing the painful experiences. This paper therefore, seeks to assess the PTDS among IDPs living in Jos North Local Government of Plateau State Nigeria.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The main purpose was to determine the rate of PTSD among IDP displaced by armed forces from rural areas of conflict to the city of Jos North LGA of Plateau state.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Psychological research are conducted to benefit humanity, similarly this study is significant in the following:
DEFINITION OF KEY STUDY VARIABLES
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychological condition triggered by a major traumatic event, such as rape, war, a terrorist act, death of a loved one, a natural disaster, or a catastrophic accident. It is marked by upsetting memories or thoughts of the ordeal, “blunting” of emotions, increased arousal, and sometimes severe personality changes.
In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association revised the PTSD diagnostic criteria in the fifth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Diagnostic criteria for PTSD include a history of exposure to a traumatic event that meets specific stipulations and symptoms from each of four symptom clusters: intrusion, avoidance, negative alterations in cognitions and mood, and alterations in arousal and reactivity. The sixth criterion concerns duration of symptoms; the seventh assesses functioning; and, the eighth criterion clarifies symptoms as not attributable to a substance or co-occurring medical condition.
Internally Displaced Persons
Internally displaced persons are “persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, violations of human rights or natural or human-made disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border (OCHA 1999)
Can't find what you are looking for?
Call (+234) 07030248044.
OTHER SIMILAR POLITICAL SCIENCE PROJECTS AND MATERIALS