WhatsApp or Call Us
WhatsApp or Call Us
07030248044TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page i
Declaration ii
Approval Page iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgment v
Abstract vi
Table of Contents vii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 Concept of Corporate Governance 9
2.2.1 Principles of Corporate Governance 13
2.2.2 Parties to Corporate Governance 16
2.2.3 Ownership Structures and Elements in Corporate Governance 17
2.3 Theoretical Framework 19
2.3.1 Agency Theory 20
2.3.2 Stewardship Theory 22
2.3.3 Stakeholder Theory 26
2.3.4 Institutional Theory 32
2.4 Empirical Literature Review on the Impact of Corporate Governance
on Firm Performance 36
2.4.1 Corporate Governance and Performance 37
2.4.2 Corporate Ownership and Performance 38
2.4.3 Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure 40
2.5 Summary 42
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction 44
3.2 Population and Sample Size 44
3.3 Source of Data Collection 44
3.4 Method of Data Collection 45
3.5 Method of Data Analysis 45
3.6 Justification 46
3.7 Summary 46
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction 47
4.2 Respondent Characteristics 47
4.3 Data Analysis 48
4.4 Discussion of Findings 52
4.5 Summary of Findings 54
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.0 Introduction 56
5.1 Summary 56
5.2 Conclusion 57
5.3 Recommendations 57
5.4 Limitation of the study 58
Bibliography 59
Appendix 61
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
Corporate governance is concerned with ways in which all parties interested in the well-being of the firm (the stakeholders) attempt to ensure that managers and other insiders take measures or adopt mechanisms that safeguard the interests of the stakeholders. Such measures are necessitated by the separation of ownership from management, an increasingly vital feature of the modern firm. A typical firm is characterized by numerous owners having no management function, and managers with no equity interest in the firm. Shareholders, or owners of equity, are generally large in number, and an average shareholder controls a minute proportion of the shares of the firm. This gives rise to the tendency for such a shareholder to take no interest in the monitoring of managers, who, left to themselves, may pursue interests different from those of the owners of equity. For example, the managers might take steps to increase the size of the firm and, often, their pay, although that may not necessarily raise the firm’s profit, the major concern of the shareholder.
Corporate governance issues in both the private and public sectors have become a popular discussion in recent time. There have been some legislative changes and provisions imposed by governments on public and private organizations around the world to improve on their governance arrangements. Telecommunication sector in Nigeria have been one of the ‘interests caught up in the national surge in governance of organizations’
Particularly in Nigeria, governance issues such as size and composition of board of directors and their roles, responsibilities and relationships have been discussed in several Government business policy reports for more than a decade.
Corporate governance can simply be defined as the system by which companies are directed and controlled which focuses on the “hygiene” and “housekeeping” aspects of running a business. As such, corporate governance can be seen as a set of relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other stakeholders that provides a structure through which the objectives of the company are set and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined.
Corporate governance issues are as old as companies themselves. At its broadest, it concerns the question of who should own and control the company and at the narrowest; it concerns the relationship between the shareholders and directors.
Many a research has been carried out world over to unearth the impact of the corporate governance on listed firms as well as correct and good practice of corporate governance in developing countries.
However Nigeria have been faced with a myriad of issues, ranging from “underdeveloped and illiquid stock markets, economic uncertainties, weak legal controls and investor protection, and frequent government intervention and coupled with poor economic performance, a predominance of concentrated shareholding and controlling ownership Therefore, Nigeria demand higher levels of effective corporate governance practices.
However, until quite recently the issue of corporate governance has received minimal attention in Nigeria. This is the reason why, many corporate organizations have been caught of getting involved in unethical practices. For example, seven top Bank executives in Nigeria that were discovered to be involved in one of the highest financial scam in the nation’s banking industry, after the CBN consolidation exercise ; which has put the credibility of their corporate image under suspicion, and threatening investors’ confidence.
Therefore an important theme of corporate governance in this regard is the nature and extent of accountability of people in the business and mechanisms that try to decrease the principal agent problem. Consequently, corporate governance mechanism has been a crucial issue under discussion with vested interest. It is against this background that the researchers see the subject matter; corporate governance and its impact on the management of Mobile Telecommunication Nig. Ltd Main Branch as an issue worthy of being investigated.
There has been considerable discussion in the academic literature of corporate governance especially managerial agency problems that arise from the separation of ownership and control. For example, Jensen and Meckling (2006) opined that a number of corporate governance mechanisms have been proposed to ameliorate this agency problem between managers and their shareholders. The proposed governance mechanisms include, for example, CEO incentive compensation, managerial ownership, monitoring by large shareholders, board size and independence, and stronger shareholder rights. Many studies have found a positive contemporaneous correlation between firm performance and good governance, which has led to numerous attempts to reform governance by institutional investors, stock exchanges and Congress in so many countries in order to increase accountability in corporate organizations.
But in spite of this, there is, however, little evidence on whether changing a firm’s governance structure leads to subsequent firm performance, as such doubt is expressed by previous studies whether firms can improve their longer term performance by implementing changes to their governance structure. It is against this gap that the researcher intend to take a survey into the subject matter:corporate governance and its impact on the management of MTN mobile communication By attempting to address an important limitation of past studies which has failed to address this gap. As such, this study aims to provide additional insights into the relationship between governance mechanisms and firm financial performance in Nigeria. The need for a study of this kind is even more important in an environment like Nigeria’s, which is characterized by growing calls for effective corporate governance, particularly for public limited liability companies. This call is understandable in view of the importance of effective governance at both microeconomic and economy-wide levels
The main objective of the study is to examine the corporate governance and its impact on the management of MTN. other specific objectives are to:
This study adds a significant practical importance, because its results support the application of appropriate regulatory agencies such as central, stock exchange as well as Nigeria security and Exchange commission and financial organization in their various policy formulations as regard corporate governance . As such the study will be significant to these organinisations and regulatory Agencies especially as they utilize the findings of this research in enhancing policy formulation as regard corporate governance in their organization. This study is important as it provides new insights into governance and performance of organization in private sector.
The study will also add to the existing knowledge as well as making an original contribution to the study of corporate governance, since it is a comprehensive investigation into the comparative roles of governance in affecting performance of organizations in Nigeria and elsewhere in the world.
The study will also be a reference material for further research on corporate governance. As such, it will be a springboard to students intending to carryout similar research.
The central research question is: What is the impact of corporate governance on the management of MTN Mobile Communication? The specific questions are:
The study covers the examination of the impact of corporate governance in the telecommunication industry with reference to MTN Mobile Communication. The collection of empirical data is limited to MTN Kaduna main office. The study covers a time from 2001 – 2011.
In this section we define the various proxy variables we use to capture changes in corporate governance.
Corporate Governance: This is a set of the structure through which the objective of the firm and set and the means of obtaining these objectives and monitoring performance are determined.
Corporation: This refers to corporate entity or a body by means of which capital is acquired and used for investing in assets producing goods and services.
Shareholder rights: Our first measure of shareholder rights is the G-Index used by Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick (2003). As in Gompers et al., we use the incidence of governance rules to construct the G-Index. Firms with low G-Index values have the strongest shareholder rights and firms with high values of the G-Index have the weakest shareholder rights.
Insider Ownership: Consistent with Himmelberg, Hubbard, and Palia (1999) we calculate the ratio of insiders’ holdings of common shares over total shares outstanding. Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1988) find a non-monotonic relationship between insider ownership and firm value and show two inflection points at 5% and 25% respectively.
Shareholders: People who have invested in a company through subscribing to the company’s stock.
Board Structure: Management at the top comprising of board of directors.
Ownership Structure: Shareholders and directors.
CEO: Acronym for Chief Executive Officer.
MTN: Mobile Telecommunication Nigeria
AGM: Annual General Meeting
BOFID: Banks and Other Financial Institution Decree
CAC :Corporate Affairs Commission
CAMD: Company and Allied Matters Decree
CBN: Central Bank of Nigeria
DPC :Development Policy Centre
FOS: Federal Office of Statistics
IAS:International accounting standard
ISD:Investments and Securities Decree
MENA: Middle East and North Africa
NAICOM: national insurance commission of nigeria
NICON: National Insurance Corporation of Nigeria plc
NEPA: National Electric Power Authority
NDIC: Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation
NNPC: Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation
NITEL: Nigerian Telecommunications Plc
NSE: Nigerian Stock Exchange
OECD: Organisation For Economic Cooperation And Development.
PLC: Public Limited Company
SEC: Securities And Exchange Commission
SOE: State Owned Enterprises
TCPC: Technical Committee On Privatization And Commercialization
Can't find what you are looking for?
Call (+234) 07030248044.
OTHER SIMILAR BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS AND MATERIALS