1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY
Housing, literally is defined as buildings or other shelters in which people live, a place to live, a dwelling and to nations a critical component in social and economic system. Housing represents one of the most basic humanneeds. To most groups housing means shelter but to others it means more as it serves as one of the bestindicators of a person’s standard of living and his or her place in the society (Nubi, 2008). It is a priority for theattainment of living standard and it is important to both rural and urban areas. These attribute make demand forhousing to know no bound as population growth and urbanization are increase very rapidly and the gap betweenhousing need and supply becomes widen. This housing deficit has continued to accumulate over the years as a result of poor housing policy implementation by successive government in Nigeria. Cultural factors such as preferences and values or social status, tasteand financial resources, also influence a house physical characteristics. In developing countries, poor housingdelivery has been attributed to inadequate mechanisms and systems for land allocation, funding, mortgageinstitutions and infrastructure (Encarta, 2007).
Nigeria is perhaps the fastest urbanizing country in the African continent. One of the most important challengesfacing the country is the provision of affordable housing. As more and more Nigerians make towns and citiestheir homes, the resulting social, economic, environmental and political challenges need to be urgently addressed(Raji, 2008).A recent study of housing situation in Nigeria put existing housing stock at 23 per 1000 inhabitant. Housingdeficit is put at 15 million houses (Mabogunje 2007) while N12 trillion will be required to finance the deficit.This is about 4 times the annual national budget of Nigeria (FHA, 2007). House prices and rents, on the otherhand, have grown ahead of general inflation. Making matters worse, the composition of houses for sale and renton the market has been inexorably shifting towards very expensive house (Nubi, 2008).
Between 1975 and 1980, there were plans of deliver 202,000 housing units to the public but only 28,500 units,representing 14.1% was achieved. Also, out of 200,000 housing units planned to be delivered between 1981 and 1985, only 47,200 (23.6%) was constructed. Under the National Housing Fund (NHF) programme initiated in1994, to produce 121,000 housing units, it was believed that less than 5% was achieved. In spite of a series ofgovernment policies towards housing delivery, there exists a gap between housing supply and demand.
Research has shown that 75% of urban housing is situated in slum conditions (UNDN, 2005), and indeed thequality of the housing is poor and clearly an affront to human dignity (Agbola and Olatubara, 2003). As part ofeffort to increasing qualitative, affordable housing for the masses in the country, the Federal Government in2004, pledged to adequately fund research pertaining to the manufacture and the use of local materials in thesector.Housing delivery in Nigeria is provided by either the Government or Private sector, but despite FederalGovernment access to factors of housing production, the country could at best expect 4.2% of the annualrequirement. Substantial contribution is expected from other public and private sectors. The production ofhousing in Nigeria is primarily the function of the private market; approximately 90% of urban housing isproduced by private developers. Due to housing demand created by rural- urban migration, which account for 65%of urban population growth, the fixed supply of urban land, and inflation of rental and housing ownership cost(Taylor, 2000).
The problem of affordable housing has been a concern forboth the government and individuals. Appreciating these problems, both public and private sector developersmake effort through various activities to bridge the gap between housing supply and demand, but the cost ofbuilding materials, deficiency of housing finance arrangement, rigorous loan conditions from mortgage banks,government policies amongst other problems have affecting housing delivery significantly in Nigeria (Raji,2008). However, the researcher is of the opinion that government still has much to do in terms of solving housing deficit in Nigeria.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The problem of housing deficit in Nigeria has been a topic of discussion at different forum of the economy. The situation even becomes more serious and worrisomewhen one realizes the fact that despite a number of political, social, and religious initiatives taken in the past in Nigeria, a large proportion of the nation’s population still lives in sub-standard and poor. In Nigeria, housing provision bygovernment commenced before political independence in 1960 and despite various government interventions andhuge investments in housing provision, the housing problem in the country still remains intractable as many rural andurban populations in Nigeria do not have access to decent, safe and affordable housing. Thisis as a result of the government inability to provide adequate and affordable housing to the populace. However, the researcher seeks to examine the role of the federal government in solving housing deficit in Nigeria.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The following are the objectives of this study:
1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
HO: Government has not solved the problem of housing deficit in Nigeria.
HA: Government has solved the problem of housing deficit in Nigeria.
1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The following are the significance of this study:
The outcome of this study will educate the Nigerian populace on the contribution of government to solving housing deficit in Nigeria. It will also sensitize the policy makers and the government on the need to address the problem of housing deficit in Nigeria.
This research will also serve as a resource base to other scholars and researchers interested in carrying out further research in this field subsequently, if applied will go to an extent to provide new explanation to the topic.
1.7 SCOPE/LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
This study on the role of the federal government in solving housing deficit in Nigeria will cover all the attempt made by both past and present government at addressing the problem of housing deficit in Nigeria.
LIMITATION OF STUDY
Financial constraint- Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview).
Time constraint- The researcher will simultaneously engage in this study with other academic work. This consequently will cut down on the time devoted for the research work.
Agbola, T. and Olatubara, C.O. (2003); Private Sector Driven Housing Delivery (in Nigeria): Issues, Constraints,Challenges and Prospects, a lead paper presented at the 2nd Annual National Workshop on Private sectorDriven Housing Delivery in Nigeria, University of Lagos, Lagos, 30th – 3rd July.
Encarta, 2007: A Computer base Microsoft software.
Raji, O. (2008): Public and private developers as agents in Urban Housing delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. The situation in Lagos state, Humanity of social sciences Journal, Vol.3, No.2: Pp. 143-150.
Mabogunje, A. (2003). Welcome address at the Stateholders Forum on Strategies for enhancing Domestic production ofBuilding Materials for Mass Housing Development in Nigeria. Held at NICON Hilton Hotel, Abuja, 24th September2003.
Nubi, O.T. (2008): Affordable Housing Delivery in Nigeria. The South African Foundation InternationalConference and Exhibition, Cape Town, October, Pp. 1-18.
Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN, 2004): National housing Policy Draft, Abuja.
OTHER SIMILAR URBAN & REGIONAL PLANNING PROJECTS AND MATERIALS